🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, states are investing hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – creating their own machine learning technologies. From Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are racing to create AI that understands native tongues and cultural specifics.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This trend is a component of a larger international competition dominated by tech giants from the United States and China. While companies like a leading AI firm and Meta invest massive capital, middle powers are likewise placing sovereign investments in the AI landscape.

But with such vast investments at stake, is it possible for developing countries attain significant gains? According to a specialist from a prominent policy organization, “Unless you’re a affluent state or a big corporation, it’s quite a hardship to create an LLM from scratch.”

Defence Concerns

Many states are hesitant to rely on external AI systems. In India, for example, American-made AI tools have at times fallen short. A particular instance saw an AI tool employed to educate students in a remote community – it communicated in the English language with a pronounced Western inflection that was difficult to follow for local students.

Furthermore there’s the defence factor. In India’s security agencies, employing particular international systems is viewed not permissible. According to a developer explained, “It could have some arbitrary learning material that could claim that, for example, Ladakh is separate from India … Utilizing that specific AI in a security environment is a major risk.”

He added, I’ve discussed with experts who are in defence. They aim to use AI, but, setting aside particular tools, they are reluctant to rely on US platforms because information could travel abroad, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Initiatives

Consequently, several nations are backing domestic projects. A particular such effort is in progress in the Indian market, where an organization is attempting to create a sovereign LLM with public funding. This project has committed approximately a substantial sum to AI development.

The expert envisions a model that is less resource-intensive than premier systems from US and Chinese corporations. He notes that India will have to make up for the resource shortfall with expertise. “Being in India, we don’t have the option of investing massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we compete against such as the hundreds of billions that the US is devoting? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Regional Priority

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is funding language models educated in the region's native tongues. These particular languages – for example the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and others – are commonly poorly represented in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the people who are creating these sovereign AI models were aware of how rapidly and how quickly the leading edge is progressing.

An executive engaged in the program explains that these systems are created to enhance larger AI, rather than displacing them. Systems such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he states, often struggle with regional languages and culture – speaking in unnatural Khmer, for instance, or recommending non-vegetarian recipes to Malay consumers.

Developing native-tongue LLMs permits local governments to include local context – and at least be “informed users” of a sophisticated system developed elsewhere.

He adds, I am prudent with the concept independent. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be more adequately included and we aim to comprehend the capabilities” of AI systems.

Multinational Collaboration

For nations seeking to establish a position in an escalating worldwide landscape, there’s a different approach: team up. Analysts affiliated with a well-known institution put forward a public AI company distributed among a group of emerging states.

They term the initiative “a collaborative AI effort”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s successful initiative to build a alternative to Boeing in the mid-20th century. This idea would entail the creation of a public AI company that would merge the assets of different nations’ AI programs – for example the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and Sweden – to develop a strong competitor to the US and Chinese major players.

The lead author of a report describing the concept says that the idea has drawn the interest of AI ministers of at least three nations to date, in addition to several national AI companies. Although it is currently centered on “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have also indicated willingness.

He comments, In today’s climate, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s diminished faith in the assurances of the existing White House. Experts are questioning such as, should we trust such systems? Suppose they choose to